Turks and Caicos Islands vs Uganda: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre

Turks and Caicos Islands
0.4611 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.4639 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
132nd
Uganda rank
131st

Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Uganda
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.4639 units per square kilometre against 0.4611 units per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0028 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 132nd and Uganda ranks 131st of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Turks and Caicos Islands averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0399 units per square kilometre 0.0641 units per square kilometre 0.0242 units per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 0.0432 units per square kilometre 0.1225 units per square kilometre 0.0793 units per square kilometre Uganda
1980s 0.0596 units per square kilometre 0.2012 units per square kilometre 0.1417 units per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 0.0716 units per square kilometre 0.2958 units per square kilometre 0.2243 units per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 0.1353 units per square kilometre 0.3586 units per square kilometre 0.2233 units per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 0.2921 units per square kilometre 0.3743 units per square kilometre 0.0822 units per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 0.4413 units per square kilometre 0.4231 units per square kilometre 0.0182 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre, Turks and Caicos Islands or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0.4639 units per square kilometre against 0.4611 units per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre between Turks and Caicos Islands and Uganda?
0.0028 units per square kilometre, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Uganda rank globally for population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 132nd and Uganda ranks 131st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Uganda: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-female-per-square-kilometre/turks-and-caicos-islands/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-female-per-square-kilometre/turks-and-caicos-islands/uganda/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Uganda: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 75-79, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.