Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre

Samoa
0.4335 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.4611 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa rank
135th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
132nd

Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Samoa
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.4611 units per square kilometre against 0.4335 units per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 0.0276 units per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Samoa ahead.

Samoa ranks 135th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 132nd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1262 units per square kilometre 0.0399 units per square kilometre 0.0863 units per square kilometre Samoa
1970s 0.176 units per square kilometre 0.0432 units per square kilometre 0.1328 units per square kilometre Samoa
1980s 0.1931 units per square kilometre 0.0596 units per square kilometre 0.1336 units per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 0.2189 units per square kilometre 0.0716 units per square kilometre 0.1473 units per square kilometre Samoa
2000s 0.3413 units per square kilometre 0.1353 units per square kilometre 0.206 units per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 0.3683 units per square kilometre 0.2921 units per square kilometre 0.0762 units per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 0.4131 units per square kilometre 0.4413 units per square kilometre 0.0282 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre, Samoa or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.4611 units per square kilometre against 0.4335 units per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre between Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0276 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre?
Samoa ranks 135th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 132nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-female-per-square-kilometre/samoa/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-female-per-square-kilometre/samoa/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 75-79, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.