Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre

Guatemala
0.7947 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.8958 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
98th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
95th

Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.8958 units per square kilometre against 0.7947 units per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.1011 units per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 98th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 95th of 215 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.072 units per square kilometre 0.3113 units per square kilometre 0.2393 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.1091 units per square kilometre 0.4454 units per square kilometre 0.3363 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.184 units per square kilometre 0.5321 units per square kilometre 0.3481 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.3051 units per square kilometre 0.5926 units per square kilometre 0.2875 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.5292 units per square kilometre 0.7232 units per square kilometre 0.1941 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.5818 units per square kilometre 0.9355 units per square kilometre 0.3538 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.7412 units per square kilometre 0.9344 units per square kilometre 0.1932 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre, Guatemala or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.8958 units per square kilometre against 0.7947 units per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre between Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.1011 units per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 98th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 95th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-female-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-female-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sao-tome-and-principe/">Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 75-79, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.