Guam vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre

Guam
3.64 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.1575 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam rank
37th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
36th

Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Guam
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
01234196119922023

How they compare

Guam currently reports 3.64 units per square kilometre against 0.1575 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 3.48 units per square kilometre.

That makes Guam's figure about 23.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Guam has been ahead every year.

Guam ranks 37th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 36th of 215 countries.

Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2163 units per square kilometre 0.0364 units per square kilometre 0.1798 units per square kilometre Guam
1970s 0.3261 units per square kilometre 0.0468 units per square kilometre 0.2793 units per square kilometre Guam
1980s 0.6063 units per square kilometre 0.0632 units per square kilometre 0.5431 units per square kilometre Guam
1990s 1.04 units per square kilometre 0.081 units per square kilometre 0.954 units per square kilometre Guam
2000s 1.71 units per square kilometre 0.1054 units per square kilometre 1.61 units per square kilometre Guam
2010s 2.42 units per square kilometre 0.1271 units per square kilometre 2.29 units per square kilometre Guam
2020s 3.22 units per square kilometre 0.1504 units per square kilometre 3.07 units per square kilometre Guam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre, Guam or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Guam, at 3.64 units per square kilometre against 0.1575 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre between Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa?
3.48 units per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre?
Guam ranks 37th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 36th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-female-per-square-kilometre/guam/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-female-per-square-kilometre/guam/sub-saharan-africa/">Guam vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 75-79, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.