Early-demographic dividend vs Puerto Rico: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre

Early-demographic dividend
0.6305 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
10.24 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Early-demographic dividend rank
16th
Puerto Rico rank
14th

Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Puerto Rico
02.557.510196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 10.24 units per square kilometre against 0.6305 units per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 9.61 units per square kilometre.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 16.2 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 16th and Puerto Rico ranks 14th of 43 groups.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1016 units per square kilometre 1.61 units per square kilometre 1.51 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 0.1399 units per square kilometre 2.51 units per square kilometre 2.37 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 0.2018 units per square kilometre 3.29 units per square kilometre 3.09 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 0.2636 units per square kilometre 4.67 units per square kilometre 4.41 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 0.3702 units per square kilometre 6.49 units per square kilometre 6.12 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 0.507 units per square kilometre 7.71 units per square kilometre 7.2 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2020s 0.6024 units per square kilometre 9.75 units per square kilometre 9.14 units per square kilometre Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre, Early-demographic dividend or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 10.24 units per square kilometre against 0.6305 units per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre between Early-demographic dividend and Puerto Rico?
9.61 units per square kilometre, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Puerto Rico rank globally for population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 16th and Puerto Rico ranks 14th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Puerto Rico: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-female-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-female-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/puerto-rico-us/">Early-demographic dividend vs Puerto Rico: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 75-79, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.