Burkina Faso vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
0.2376 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.2408 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
159th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
158th

Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.2408 units per square kilometre against 0.2376 units per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.0032 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 159th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 158th of 215 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0339 units per square kilometre 0.028 units per square kilometre 0.0059 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1970s 0.055 units per square kilometre 0.0408 units per square kilometre 0.0142 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1980s 0.0882 units per square kilometre 0.0689 units per square kilometre 0.0193 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1990s 0.1185 units per square kilometre 0.0982 units per square kilometre 0.0203 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2000s 0.1417 units per square kilometre 0.1176 units per square kilometre 0.0241 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 0.1822 units per square kilometre 0.1523 units per square kilometre 0.0299 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 0.2303 units per square kilometre 0.2178 units per square kilometre 0.0125 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.2408 units per square kilometre against 0.2376 units per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0032 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 159th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 158th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-female-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-75-79-female-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/tanzania/">Burkina Faso vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 75-79, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 75-79, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.