Turks and Caicos Islands vs Uganda: Population ages 70-74, male, per square kilometre

Turks and Caicos Islands
0.6358 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Uganda
0.6032 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
127th
Uganda rank
130th

Population ages 70-74, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Uganda
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.6358 units per square kilometre against 0.6032 units per square kilometre in Uganda, a difference of 0.0326 units per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 127th and Uganda ranks 130th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Turks and Caicos Islands averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turks and Caicos Islands Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.028 units per square kilometre 0.1451 units per square kilometre 0.1172 units per square kilometre Uganda
1970s 0.0345 units per square kilometre 0.2417 units per square kilometre 0.2072 units per square kilometre Uganda
1980s 0.0617 units per square kilometre 0.3218 units per square kilometre 0.2602 units per square kilometre Uganda
1990s 0.0869 units per square kilometre 0.365 units per square kilometre 0.2781 units per square kilometre Uganda
2000s 0.1499 units per square kilometre 0.3562 units per square kilometre 0.2063 units per square kilometre Uganda
2010s 0.3371 units per square kilometre 0.3649 units per square kilometre 0.0278 units per square kilometre Uganda
2020s 0.5826 units per square kilometre 0.556 units per square kilometre 0.0266 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 70-74, male, per square kilometre, Turks and Caicos Islands or Uganda?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.6358 units per square kilometre against 0.6032 units per square kilometre in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 70-74, male, per square kilometre between Turks and Caicos Islands and Uganda?
0.0326 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Uganda rank globally for population ages 70-74, male, per square kilometre?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 127th and Uganda ranks 130th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 70-74, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Uganda: Population ages 70-74, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-male-per-square-kilometre/turks-and-caicos-islands/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-male-per-square-kilometre/turks-and-caicos-islands/uganda/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Uganda: Population ages 70-74, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 70-74, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 70-74, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.