Tanzania, United Republic of vs Uruguay: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre

Tanzania, United Republic of
0.3796 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
0.4031 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
159th
Uruguay rank
156th

Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Tanzania, United Republic of
  • Uruguay
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.4031 units per square kilometre against 0.3796 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0235 units per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 159th and Uruguay ranks 156th of 215 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tanzania, United Republic of Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0521 units per square kilometre 0.1939 units per square kilometre 0.1418 units per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 0.0759 units per square kilometre 0.2353 units per square kilometre 0.1594 units per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 0.121 units per square kilometre 0.2933 units per square kilometre 0.1723 units per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 0.1493 units per square kilometre 0.335 units per square kilometre 0.1857 units per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.1773 units per square kilometre 0.3839 units per square kilometre 0.2066 units per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.2505 units per square kilometre 0.3868 units per square kilometre 0.1363 units per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 0.3573 units per square kilometre 0.3976 units per square kilometre 0.0403 units per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre, Tanzania, United Republic of or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.4031 units per square kilometre against 0.3796 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre between Tanzania, United Republic of and Uruguay?
0.0235 units per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Uruguay rank globally for population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre?
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 159th and Uruguay ranks 156th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Uruguay: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-square-kilometre/tanzania/uruguay/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Uruguay: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 70-74, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.