Qatar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre

Qatar
0.3919 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.3796 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar rank
157th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
159th

Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Qatar
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.3919 units per square kilometre against 0.3796 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0123 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Qatar ranks 157th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 159th of 215 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0222 units per square kilometre 0.0521 units per square kilometre 0.0299 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 0.0334 units per square kilometre 0.0759 units per square kilometre 0.0425 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 0.0354 units per square kilometre 0.121 units per square kilometre 0.0856 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 0.0489 units per square kilometre 0.1493 units per square kilometre 0.1005 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0.0898 units per square kilometre 0.1773 units per square kilometre 0.0874 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.1912 units per square kilometre 0.2505 units per square kilometre 0.0593 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.3384 units per square kilometre 0.3573 units per square kilometre 0.0189 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre, Qatar or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Qatar, at 0.3919 units per square kilometre against 0.3796 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre between Qatar and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0123 units per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Qatar and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre?
Qatar ranks 157th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 159th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-square-kilometre/qatar/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-square-kilometre/qatar/tanzania/">Qatar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 70-74, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.