Ecuador vs United States of America: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.8649 units per square kilometre
in 2023
United States of America
0.8809 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
121st
United States of America rank
119th

Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • United States of America
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 0.8809 units per square kilometre against 0.8649 units per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.016 units per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 121st and United States of America ranks 119th of 215 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1307 units per square kilometre 0.3068 units per square kilometre 0.1762 units per square kilometre United States of America
1970s 0.1528 units per square kilometre 0.3729 units per square kilometre 0.2201 units per square kilometre United States of America
1980s 0.1942 units per square kilometre 0.4594 units per square kilometre 0.2652 units per square kilometre United States of America
1990s 0.273 units per square kilometre 0.5248 units per square kilometre 0.2518 units per square kilometre United States of America
2000s 0.4249 units per square kilometre 0.512 units per square kilometre 0.087 units per square kilometre United States of America
2010s 0.6122 units per square kilometre 0.6474 units per square kilometre 0.0352 units per square kilometre United States of America
2020s 0.8158 units per square kilometre 0.8495 units per square kilometre 0.0337 units per square kilometre United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre, Ecuador or United States of America?
United States of America, at 0.8809 units per square kilometre against 0.8649 units per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre between Ecuador and United States of America?
0.016 units per square kilometre, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and United States of America?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and United States of America rank globally for population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 121st and United States of America ranks 119th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs United States of America: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/united-states/">Ecuador vs United States of America: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 70-74, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.