Congo vs Iceland: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre

Congo
0.079 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0758 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
200th
Iceland rank
201st

Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Iceland
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.079 units per square kilometre against 0.0758 units per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0032 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Congo ranks 200th and Iceland ranks 201st of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0201 units per square kilometre 0.0246 units per square kilometre 0.0045 units per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.0255 units per square kilometre 0.0284 units per square kilometre 0.0029 units per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.032 units per square kilometre 0.0337 units per square kilometre 0.0016 units per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0441 units per square kilometre 0.0408 units per square kilometre 0.0032 units per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0511 units per square kilometre 0.0461 units per square kilometre 0.005 units per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0592 units per square kilometre 0.054 units per square kilometre 0.0052 units per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.074 units per square kilometre 0.0725 units per square kilometre 0.0015 units per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre, Congo or Iceland?
Congo, at 0.079 units per square kilometre against 0.0758 units per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre between Congo and Iceland?
0.0032 units per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Iceland rank globally for population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 200th and Iceland ranks 201st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Iceland: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/iceland/">Congo vs Iceland: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 70-74, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.