Central Europe and the Baltics vs Macao: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
2.9 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Macao
395.03 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
5th
Macao rank
2nd

Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Macao
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Macao currently reports 395.03 units per square kilometre against 2.9 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 392.13 units per square kilometre.

That makes Macao's figure about 136.1 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Macao ranks 2nd of 43 groups.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Macao Difference Ahead
1960s 1.82 units per square kilometre 92.77 units per square kilometre 90.94 units per square kilometre Macao
1970s 2.52 units per square kilometre 170.1 units per square kilometre 167.59 units per square kilometre Macao
1980s 2.7 units per square kilometre 163.19 units per square kilometre 160.49 units per square kilometre Macao
1990s 2.18 units per square kilometre 218.06 units per square kilometre 215.88 units per square kilometre Macao
2000s 2.32 units per square kilometre 184.33 units per square kilometre 182.01 units per square kilometre Macao
2010s 2.26 units per square kilometre 187.83 units per square kilometre 185.58 units per square kilometre Macao
2020s 2.78 units per square kilometre 349.26 units per square kilometre 346.48 units per square kilometre Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Macao?
Macao, at 395.03 units per square kilometre against 2.9 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Macao?
392.13 units per square kilometre, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Macao?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Macao rank globally for population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Macao ranks 2nd of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Macao: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/macao-sar-china/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Macao: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 70-74, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.