Australia vs Congo: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre

Australia
0.0794 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.079 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
199th
Congo rank
200th

Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Congo
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0794 units per square kilometre against 0.079 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0004 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 199th and Congo ranks 200th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Congo in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0206 units per square kilometre 0.0201 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.024 units per square kilometre 0.0255 units per square kilometre 0.0015 units per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0324 units per square kilometre 0.032 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.0402 units per square kilometre 0.0441 units per square kilometre 0.0038 units per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0431 units per square kilometre 0.0511 units per square kilometre 0.008 units per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0568 units per square kilometre 0.0592 units per square kilometre 0.0024 units per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0767 units per square kilometre 0.074 units per square kilometre 0.0027 units per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre, Australia or Congo?
Australia, at 0.0794 units per square kilometre against 0.079 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre between Australia and Congo?
0.0004 units per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Congo rank globally for population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 199th and Congo ranks 200th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Congo: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-square-kilometre/australia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-square-kilometre/australia/congo-rep/">Australia vs Congo: Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 70-74, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 70-74, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.