Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Japan: Population ages 70-74, female, per capita

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.025 units per person
in 2025
Japan
0.0331 units per person
in 2025
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
8th
Japan rank
11th

Population ages 70-74, female, per capita over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Japan
0.010.020.030.04196019922025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0.0331 units per person against 0.025 units per person in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0081 units per person.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.3 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 8th and Japan ranks 11th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) averaged higher in 3 and Japan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0119 units per person 0.01 units per person 0.0018 units per person Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
1970s 0.0155 units per person 0.0127 units per person 0.0028 units per person Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
1980s 0.0167 units per person 0.0166 units per person 0.0001 units per person Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
1990s 0.017 units per person 0.0218 units per person 0.0048 units per person Japan
2000s 0.0202 units per person 0.0277 units per person 0.0075 units per person Japan
2010s 0.0182 units per person 0.0328 units per person 0.0146 units per person Japan
2020s 0.0231 units per person 0.0372 units per person 0.0141 units per person Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 70-74, female, per capita, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or Japan?
Japan, at 0.0331 units per person against 0.025 units per person in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 70-74, female, per capita between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Japan?
0.0081 units per person, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Japan?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and Japan rank globally for population ages 70-74, female, per capita?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 8th and Japan ranks 11th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 70-74, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Japan: Population ages 70-74, female, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-70-74-female-per-capita/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/japan/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Japan: Population ages 70-74, female, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 70-74, female, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 70-74, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.