Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Nigeria: Population ages 65 and above, total, per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Nigeria
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
27th
Nigeria rank
30th

Population ages 65 and above, total, per unit of GDP over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Nigeria
00000196019922025

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 2.4 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ahead.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 27th and Nigeria ranks 30th of 44 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) averaged higher in 3 and Nigeria in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Nigeria Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Nigeria
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, total, per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, total, per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Nigeria?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Nigeria?
39 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2025.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Nigeria rank globally for population ages 65 and above, total, per unit of gdp?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 27th and Nigeria ranks 30th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Nigeria: Population ages 65 and above, total, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-total-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-total-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/nigeria/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Nigeria: Population ages 65 and above, total, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, total, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 14,741 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, total divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.