New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre

New Caledonia
1.76 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.53 units per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
173rd
Zimbabwe rank
175th

Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 1.76 units per square kilometre against 1.53 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.23 units per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 175th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1676 units per square kilometre 0.3827 units per square kilometre 0.2151 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.2565 units per square kilometre 0.5027 units per square kilometre 0.2461 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.3602 units per square kilometre 0.7018 units per square kilometre 0.3416 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.5067 units per square kilometre 0.9479 units per square kilometre 0.4412 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.8343 units per square kilometre 1.05 units per square kilometre 0.2138 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 1.33 units per square kilometre 1.2 units per square kilometre 0.1255 units per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 1.67 units per square kilometre 1.48 units per square kilometre 0.1884 units per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre, New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
New Caledonia, at 1.76 units per square kilometre against 1.53 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
0.23 units per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre?
New Caledonia ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 175th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-total-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-total-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/">New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.