Least developed countries vs Sri Lanka: Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre

Least developed countries
2.14 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
41.82 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
33rd
Sri Lanka rank
31st

Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Sri Lanka
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 41.82 units per square kilometre against 2.14 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 39.68 units per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 19.6 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 33rd and Sri Lanka ranks 31st of 44 groups.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5054 units per square kilometre 6.74 units per square kilometre 6.23 units per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 0.6626 units per square kilometre 8.68 units per square kilometre 8.02 units per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0.8812 units per square kilometre 12.32 units per square kilometre 11.44 units per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 1.07 units per square kilometre 16.71 units per square kilometre 15.64 units per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 1.34 units per square kilometre 21.28 units per square kilometre 19.94 units per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 1.63 units per square kilometre 30.1 units per square kilometre 28.47 units per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 2.03 units per square kilometre 40.04 units per square kilometre 38.01 units per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre, Least developed countries or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 41.82 units per square kilometre against 2.14 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre between Least developed countries and Sri Lanka?
39.68 units per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Least developed countries and Sri Lanka rank globally for population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre?
Least developed countries ranks 33rd and Sri Lanka ranks 31st of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Sri Lanka: Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-total-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-total-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/sri-lanka/">Least developed countries vs Sri Lanka: Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.