Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre

Lao People's Democratic Republic
1.51 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.53 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
177th
Zimbabwe rank
175th

Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Zimbabwe
0.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.53 units per square kilometre against 1.51 units per square kilometre in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.02 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 177th and Zimbabwe ranks 175th of 215 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3011 units per square kilometre 0.3827 units per square kilometre 0.0816 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.4171 units per square kilometre 0.5027 units per square kilometre 0.0855 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.5548 units per square kilometre 0.7018 units per square kilometre 0.1469 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.7162 units per square kilometre 0.9479 units per square kilometre 0.2318 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.8755 units per square kilometre 1.05 units per square kilometre 0.1726 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 1.19 units per square kilometre 1.2 units per square kilometre 0.0164 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 1.42 units per square kilometre 1.48 units per square kilometre 0.0591 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.53 units per square kilometre against 1.51 units per square kilometre in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Zimbabwe?
0.02 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 177th and Zimbabwe ranks 175th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-total-per-square-kilometre/lao-pdr/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-total-per-square-kilometre/lao-pdr/zimbabwe/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.