China vs Rwanda: Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre

China
21.51 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
21.62 units per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
58th
Rwanda rank
57th

Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Rwanda
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 21.62 units per square kilometre against 21.51 units per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.11 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

China ranks 58th and Rwanda ranks 57th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 2.85 units per square kilometre 4.24 units per square kilometre 1.4 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 3.8 units per square kilometre 5 units per square kilometre 1.2 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 5.37 units per square kilometre 5.88 units per square kilometre 0.5087 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 7.68 units per square kilometre 6.22 units per square kilometre 1.46 units per square kilometre China
2000s 10.8 units per square kilometre 9.25 units per square kilometre 1.54 units per square kilometre China
2010s 14.78 units per square kilometre 13.97 units per square kilometre 0.811 units per square kilometre China
2020s 20.28 units per square kilometre 20.03 units per square kilometre 0.2444 units per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre, China or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 21.62 units per square kilometre against 21.51 units per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre between China and Rwanda?
0.11 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Rwanda rank globally for population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre?
China ranks 58th and Rwanda ranks 57th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Rwanda: Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-total-per-square-kilometre/china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-total-per-square-kilometre/china/rwanda/">China vs Rwanda: Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.