IBRD only vs Latvia: Population ages 65 and above
IBRD only
10.6%
in 2025
Latvia
22.2%
in 2025
IBRD only rank
17th
Latvia rank
20th
Population ages 65 and above over time
- IBRD only
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 22.2% against 10.6% in IBRD only, a difference of 11.6%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 2.1 times IBRD only's.
Across all 66 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 17th and Latvia ranks 20th of 47 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.0% | 11.1% | 7.1% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 4.4% | 12.6% | 8.2% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 4.8% | 12.0% | 7.2% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 5.5% | 13.4% | 7.9% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 6.5% | 16.6% | 10.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 7.7% | 19.3% | 11.6% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 9.9% | 21.3% | 11.4% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 65 and above, IBRD only or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 22.2% against 10.6% in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in population ages 65 and above between IBRD only and Latvia?
- 11.6%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Latvia?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
- How do IBRD only and Latvia rank globally for population ages 65 and above?
- IBRD only ranks 17th and Latvia ranks 20th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN), publisher: UN Population Division, published as Population ages 65 and above (% of total population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population ages 65 and above as a percentage of the total population. Population is based on the de facto definition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status or citizenship.