South Korea vs Low & middle income: Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre

South Korea
42.34 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income
3.08 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Korea rank
13th
Low & middle income rank
14th

Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre over time

  • South Korea
  • Low & middle income
010203040196119922023

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 42.34 units per square kilometre against 3.08 units per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 39.26 units per square kilometre.

That makes South Korea's figure about 13.8 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

South Korea ranks 13th and Low & middle income ranks 14th of 215 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Low & middle income Difference Ahead
1960s 3.81 units per square kilometre 0.5507 units per square kilometre 3.26 units per square kilometre South Korea
1970s 4.97 units per square kilometre 0.7378 units per square kilometre 4.23 units per square kilometre South Korea
1980s 6.73 units per square kilometre 0.9935 units per square kilometre 5.74 units per square kilometre South Korea
1990s 10.12 units per square kilometre 1.27 units per square kilometre 8.85 units per square kilometre South Korea
2000s 17.8 units per square kilometre 1.71 units per square kilometre 16.08 units per square kilometre South Korea
2010s 28.15 units per square kilometre 2.24 units per square kilometre 25.91 units per square kilometre South Korea
2020s 39.19 units per square kilometre 2.92 units per square kilometre 36.27 units per square kilometre South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre, South Korea or Low & middle income?
South Korea, at 42.34 units per square kilometre against 3.08 units per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre between South Korea and Low & middle income?
39.26 units per square kilometre, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Low & middle income?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Korea and Low & middle income rank globally for population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre?
South Korea ranks 13th and Low & middle income ranks 14th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Low & middle income: Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-male-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-male-per-square-kilometre/korea-rep/low-and-middle-income/">South Korea vs Low & middle income: Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.