Gibraltar vs Hong Kong, China: Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre

Gibraltar
311.9 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
730.48 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Gibraltar rank
5th
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd

Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Hong Kong, China
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 730.48 units per square kilometre against 311.9 units per square kilometre in Gibraltar, a difference of 418.58 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 2.3 times Gibraltar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gibraltar ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 5th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gibraltar averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong, China in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1960s 75.47 units per square kilometre 32.37 units per square kilometre 43.09 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1970s 103.53 units per square kilometre 81.17 units per square kilometre 22.36 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1980s 123.95 units per square kilometre 168.37 units per square kilometre 44.42 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 147.31 units per square kilometre 264.38 units per square kilometre 117.07 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 191.49 units per square kilometre 365.64 units per square kilometre 174.15 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 256.55 units per square kilometre 495.09 units per square kilometre 238.54 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 301.05 units per square kilometre 674.6 units per square kilometre 373.55 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre, Gibraltar or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 730.48 units per square kilometre against 311.9 units per square kilometre in Gibraltar as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre between Gibraltar and Hong Kong, China?
418.58 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Hong Kong, China?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gibraltar and Hong Kong, China rank globally for population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre?
Gibraltar ranks 5th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Hong Kong, China: Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-male-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-male-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/hong-kong-sar-china/">Gibraltar vs Hong Kong, China: Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.