Djibouti vs Equatorial Guinea: Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre

Djibouti
1.05 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
1.12 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Djibouti rank
162nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
160th

Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Djibouti
  • Equatorial Guinea
00.250.50.751196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1.12 units per square kilometre against 1.05 units per square kilometre in Djibouti, a difference of 0.07 units per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Djibouti's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Djibouti ranks 162nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 160th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0523 units per square kilometre 0.2471 units per square kilometre 0.1948 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.1086 units per square kilometre 0.2116 units per square kilometre 0.103 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.2261 units per square kilometre 0.2317 units per square kilometre 0.0056 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.388 units per square kilometre 0.3038 units per square kilometre 0.0842 units per square kilometre Djibouti
2000s 0.5472 units per square kilometre 0.4703 units per square kilometre 0.0769 units per square kilometre Djibouti
2010s 0.8002 units per square kilometre 0.7643 units per square kilometre 0.036 units per square kilometre Djibouti
2020s 1 units per square kilometre 1.05 units per square kilometre 0.0519 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre, Djibouti or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 1.12 units per square kilometre against 1.05 units per square kilometre in Djibouti as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre between Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea?
0.07 units per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Djibouti and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre?
Djibouti ranks 162nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 160th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Equatorial Guinea: Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-male-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-male-per-square-kilometre/djibouti/equatorial-guinea/">Djibouti vs Equatorial Guinea: Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.