Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Population ages 65 and above, male, per capita

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.0838 units per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
0.1109 units per person
in 2025
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
5th
Hong Kong, China rank
5th

Population ages 65 and above, male, per capita over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Hong Kong, China
00.0250.050.0750.1196019922025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.1109 units per person against 0.0838 units per person in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 0.0271 units per person.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.3 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Hong Kong, China ranks 5th of 44 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 4 and Hong Kong, China in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0327 units per person 0.0091 units per person 0.0236 units per person Central Europe and the Baltics
1970s 0.0422 units per person 0.0185 units per person 0.0238 units per person Central Europe and the Baltics
1980s 0.0417 units per person 0.0307 units per person 0.011 units per person Central Europe and the Baltics
1990s 0.0469 units per person 0.0438 units per person 0.0031 units per person Central Europe and the Baltics
2000s 0.0552 units per person 0.0563 units per person 0.0011 units per person Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.0656 units per person 0.0714 units per person 0.0058 units per person Hong Kong, China
2020s 0.0797 units per person 0.0996 units per person 0.0199 units per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, male, per capita, Central Europe and the Baltics or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 0.1109 units per person against 0.0838 units per person in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, male, per capita between Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China?
0.0271 units per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China rank globally for population ages 65 and above, male, per capita?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 5th and Hong Kong, China ranks 5th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, male, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Population ages 65 and above, male, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-male-per-capita/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-male-per-capita/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Population ages 65 and above, male, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, male, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
265 places, 17,460 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, male divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.