Norway vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre

Norway
1.49 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
1.37 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
157th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
160th

Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 1.49 units per square kilometre against 1.37 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.12 units per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Norway ranks 157th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 160th of 215 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6792 units per square kilometre 0.1786 units per square kilometre 0.5006 units per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.8493 units per square kilometre 0.2658 units per square kilometre 0.5835 units per square kilometre Norway
1980s 1.03 units per square kilometre 0.4061 units per square kilometre 0.6224 units per square kilometre Norway
1990s 1.11 units per square kilometre 0.5346 units per square kilometre 0.5744 units per square kilometre Norway
2000s 1.08 units per square kilometre 0.6586 units per square kilometre 0.4242 units per square kilometre Norway
2010s 1.25 units per square kilometre 0.9476 units per square kilometre 0.2994 units per square kilometre Norway
2020s 1.44 units per square kilometre 1.29 units per square kilometre 0.157 units per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre, Norway or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Norway, at 1.49 units per square kilometre against 1.37 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre between Norway and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.12 units per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 157th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 160th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/norway/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/norway/tanzania/">Norway vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.