Jordan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre

Jordan
2.86 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
2.92 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
129th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
128th

Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Jordan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0123196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 2.92 units per square kilometre against 2.86 units per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0.06 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Jordan ranks 129th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 128th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2221 units per square kilometre 0.2113 units per square kilometre 0.0108 units per square kilometre Jordan
1970s 0.2935 units per square kilometre 0.2445 units per square kilometre 0.049 units per square kilometre Jordan
1980s 0.3903 units per square kilometre 0.2828 units per square kilometre 0.1075 units per square kilometre Jordan
1990s 0.661 units per square kilometre 0.3492 units per square kilometre 0.3119 units per square kilometre Jordan
2000s 1.11 units per square kilometre 0.6399 units per square kilometre 0.4679 units per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 1.82 units per square kilometre 1.68 units per square kilometre 0.1342 units per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 2.64 units per square kilometre 2.75 units per square kilometre 0.1146 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre, Jordan or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 2.92 units per square kilometre against 2.86 units per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre between Jordan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.06 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre?
Jordan ranks 129th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 128th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/jordan/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/jordan/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Jordan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.