Hong Kong vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre

Hong Kong
823.05 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
18.04 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
3rd
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
1st

Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 823.05 units per square kilometre against 18.04 units per square kilometre in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 805.01 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 45.6 times South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 3rd and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 1st of 215 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1960s 66.47 units per square kilometre 2.93 units per square kilometre 63.54 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
1970s 145.64 units per square kilometre 3.92 units per square kilometre 141.71 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 234.92 units per square kilometre 5.34 units per square kilometre 229.59 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 325.29 units per square kilometre 7.14 units per square kilometre 318.15 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 423.22 units per square kilometre 9.66 units per square kilometre 413.56 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 563.19 units per square kilometre 13.24 units per square kilometre 549.95 units per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 759.56 units per square kilometre 17.14 units per square kilometre 742.42 units per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre, Hong Kong or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
Hong Kong, at 823.05 units per square kilometre against 18.04 units per square kilometre in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre between Hong Kong and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
805.01 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 3rd and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 1st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Hong Kong vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.