Congo vs Iceland: Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre

Congo
0.2877 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.3026 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
200th
Iceland rank
199th

Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Iceland
0.050.10.150.20.250.3196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.3026 units per square kilometre against 0.2877 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0149 units per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 200th and Iceland ranks 199th of 215 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0698 units per square kilometre 0.0874 units per square kilometre 0.0176 units per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.0888 units per square kilometre 0.1079 units per square kilometre 0.0192 units per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.1125 units per square kilometre 0.1349 units per square kilometre 0.0224 units per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.1493 units per square kilometre 0.1633 units per square kilometre 0.0139 units per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.1786 units per square kilometre 0.1898 units per square kilometre 0.0111 units per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.2158 units per square kilometre 0.2357 units per square kilometre 0.0199 units per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.2698 units per square kilometre 0.2897 units per square kilometre 0.0199 units per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre, Congo or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0.3026 units per square kilometre against 0.2877 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre between Congo and Iceland?
0.0149 units per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Iceland rank globally for population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 200th and Iceland ranks 199th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Iceland: Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/iceland/">Congo vs Iceland: Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.