Antigua and Barbuda vs Cayman Islands: Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
14.1 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Cayman Islands
13.99 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
48th
Cayman Islands rank
50th

Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Cayman Islands
051015196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 14.1 units per square kilometre against 13.99 units per square kilometre in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.11 units per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 48th and Cayman Islands ranks 50th of 215 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Cayman Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 4.14 units per square kilometre 1.67 units per square kilometre 2.47 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 5.67 units per square kilometre 2.24 units per square kilometre 3.43 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 7.35 units per square kilometre 3.24 units per square kilometre 4.11 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 7.31 units per square kilometre 4.3 units per square kilometre 3.01 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 7.65 units per square kilometre 5.76 units per square kilometre 1.89 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 9.83 units per square kilometre 8.28 units per square kilometre 1.56 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 13.13 units per square kilometre 12.61 units per square kilometre 0.5214 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Cayman Islands?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 14.1 units per square kilometre against 13.99 units per square kilometre in Cayman Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Cayman Islands?
0.11 units per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Cayman Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Cayman Islands rank globally for population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 48th and Cayman Islands ranks 50th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Cayman Islands: Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/cayman-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-and-above-female-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/cayman-islands/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Cayman Islands: Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65 and above, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65 and above, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.