French Polynesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre

French Polynesia
1.69 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
1.7 units per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
97th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
96th

Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.7 units per square kilometre against 1.69 units per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.01 units per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

French Polynesia ranks 97th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 96th of 215 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.172 units per square kilometre 0.6098 units per square kilometre 0.4378 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.2419 units per square kilometre 0.7485 units per square kilometre 0.5066 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.3071 units per square kilometre 0.9299 units per square kilometre 0.6228 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.4648 units per square kilometre 1.13 units per square kilometre 0.6701 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.7927 units per square kilometre 1.16 units per square kilometre 0.3657 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 1.11 units per square kilometre 1.2 units per square kilometre 0.0916 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 1.58 units per square kilometre 1.63 units per square kilometre 0.0549 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre, French Polynesia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.7 units per square kilometre against 1.69 units per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre between French Polynesia and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.01 units per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre?
French Polynesia ranks 97th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 96th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-male-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-male-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/sao-tome-and-principe/">French Polynesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
259 places, 15,029 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.