Cayman Islands vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre
Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre over time
- Cayman Islands
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Cayman Islands currently reports 4.85 units per square kilometre against 0.3189 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 4.53 units per square kilometre.
That makes Cayman Islands's figure about 15.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Cayman Islands has been ahead every year.
Cayman Islands ranks 41st and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 38th of 215 countries.
Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3537 units per square kilometre | 0.0818 units per square kilometre | 0.2719 units per square kilometre | Cayman Islands |
| 1970s | 0.5525 units per square kilometre | 0.1056 units per square kilometre | 0.4469 units per square kilometre | Cayman Islands |
| 1980s | 0.9012 units per square kilometre | 0.1383 units per square kilometre | 0.7629 units per square kilometre | Cayman Islands |
| 1990s | 1.22 units per square kilometre | 0.1676 units per square kilometre | 1.05 units per square kilometre | Cayman Islands |
| 2000s | 1.8 units per square kilometre | 0.2028 units per square kilometre | 1.6 units per square kilometre | Cayman Islands |
| 2010s | 3.07 units per square kilometre | 0.245 units per square kilometre | 2.82 units per square kilometre | Cayman Islands |
| 2020s | 4.38 units per square kilometre | 0.3029 units per square kilometre | 4.07 units per square kilometre | Cayman Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre, Cayman Islands or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Cayman Islands, at 4.85 units per square kilometre against 0.3189 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 4.53 units per square kilometre, with Cayman Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cayman Islands and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre?
- Cayman Islands ranks 41st and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 38th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population ages 65-69, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.