Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre

Guatemala
1.7 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
1.84 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
102nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
100th

Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.84 units per square kilometre against 1.7 units per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.14 units per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Guatemala ranks 102nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 100th of 216 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2284 units per square kilometre 0.7073 units per square kilometre 0.4788 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.3223 units per square kilometre 0.8455 units per square kilometre 0.5232 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.4641 units per square kilometre 1.01 units per square kilometre 0.5438 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.7418 units per square kilometre 1.17 units per square kilometre 0.4327 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.8036 units per square kilometre 1.3 units per square kilometre 0.4956 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 1.21 units per square kilometre 1.28 units per square kilometre 0.0772 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 1.61 units per square kilometre 1.74 units per square kilometre 0.1261 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre, Guatemala or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.84 units per square kilometre against 1.7 units per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre between Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.14 units per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 102nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 100th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sao-tome-and-principe/">Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.