Guam vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre

Guam
6.96 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.3818 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam rank
33rd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
35th

Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Guam
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0246196119922023

How they compare

Guam currently reports 6.96 units per square kilometre against 0.3818 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 6.58 units per square kilometre.

That makes Guam's figure about 18.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Guam has been ahead every year.

Guam ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 35th of 216 countries.

Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.522 units per square kilometre 0.0962 units per square kilometre 0.4258 units per square kilometre Guam
1970s 0.8754 units per square kilometre 0.1217 units per square kilometre 0.7536 units per square kilometre Guam
1980s 1.57 units per square kilometre 0.1599 units per square kilometre 1.41 units per square kilometre Guam
1990s 2.64 units per square kilometre 0.1972 units per square kilometre 2.44 units per square kilometre Guam
2000s 3.57 units per square kilometre 0.2433 units per square kilometre 3.32 units per square kilometre Guam
2010s 5.16 units per square kilometre 0.2876 units per square kilometre 4.87 units per square kilometre Guam
2020s 6.74 units per square kilometre 0.3617 units per square kilometre 6.38 units per square kilometre Guam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre, Guam or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Guam, at 6.96 units per square kilometre against 0.3818 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre between Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa?
6.58 units per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
Guam ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 35th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-square-kilometre/guam/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-square-kilometre/guam/sub-saharan-africa/">Guam vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.