Faroe Islands vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre
Faroe Islands
0.9942 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.01 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
130th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
129th
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre over time
- Faroe Islands
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 1.01 units per square kilometre against 0.9942 units per square kilometre in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.0158 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 130th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 129th of 216 countries.
Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3972 units per square kilometre | 0.0771 units per square kilometre | 0.3202 units per square kilometre | Faroe Islands |
| 1970s | 0.4538 units per square kilometre | 0.0942 units per square kilometre | 0.3596 units per square kilometre | Faroe Islands |
| 1980s | 0.6381 units per square kilometre | 0.1017 units per square kilometre | 0.5364 units per square kilometre | Faroe Islands |
| 1990s | 0.6664 units per square kilometre | 0.1122 units per square kilometre | 0.5542 units per square kilometre | Faroe Islands |
| 2000s | 0.6279 units per square kilometre | 0.1935 units per square kilometre | 0.4345 units per square kilometre | Faroe Islands |
| 2010s | 0.8737 units per square kilometre | 0.5417 units per square kilometre | 0.332 units per square kilometre | Faroe Islands |
| 2020s | 0.9715 units per square kilometre | 0.9574 units per square kilometre | 0.0141 units per square kilometre | Faroe Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre, Faroe Islands or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 1.01 units per square kilometre against 0.9942 units per square kilometre in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre between Faroe Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0158 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Faroe Islands and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
- Faroe Islands ranks 130th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 129th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.