Antigua and Barbuda vs Rwanda: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
5.09 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
5.39 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
46th
Rwanda rank
44th

Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Rwanda
12345196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 5.39 units per square kilometre against 5.09 units per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.3 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 46th and Rwanda ranks 44th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.73 units per square kilometre 0.9733 units per square kilometre 0.7595 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 2.13 units per square kilometre 1.15 units per square kilometre 0.9836 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 2.35 units per square kilometre 1.35 units per square kilometre 1 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 1.98 units per square kilometre 1.6 units per square kilometre 0.3803 units per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 2.11 units per square kilometre 2.31 units per square kilometre 0.198 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 3.33 units per square kilometre 3.36 units per square kilometre 0.0284 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 4.71 units per square kilometre 5 units per square kilometre 0.283 units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 5.39 units per square kilometre against 5.09 units per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda?
0.3 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda rank globally for population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 46th and Rwanda ranks 44th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Rwanda: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/rwanda/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Rwanda: Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65-69, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 65-69, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.