East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Puerto Rico: Population ages 65-69, female, per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.0234 units per person
in 2025
Puerto Rico
0.0373 units per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
13th
Puerto Rico rank
14th

Population ages 65-69, female, per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Puerto Rico
0.010.020.030.04196019922025

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0.0373 units per person against 0.0234 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0139 units per person.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.6 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 13th and Puerto Rico ranks 14th of 43 groups.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0092 units per person 0.0111 units per person 0.0019 units per person Puerto Rico
1970s 0.0096 units per person 0.013 units per person 0.0034 units per person Puerto Rico
1980s 0.0102 units per person 0.0149 units per person 0.0046 units per person Puerto Rico
1990s 0.0116 units per person 0.0182 units per person 0.0066 units per person Puerto Rico
2000s 0.0134 units per person 0.0203 units per person 0.007 units per person Puerto Rico
2010s 0.0171 units per person 0.0276 units per person 0.0105 units per person Puerto Rico
2020s 0.0237 units per person 0.0367 units per person 0.013 units per person Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65-69, female, per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 0.0373 units per person against 0.0234 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 65-69, female, per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Puerto Rico?
0.0139 units per person, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Puerto Rico?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Puerto Rico rank globally for population ages 65-69, female, per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 13th and Puerto Rico ranks 14th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Puerto Rico: Population ages 65-69, female, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/puerto-rico-us/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Puerto Rico: Population ages 65-69, female, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65-69, female, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 65-69, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.