East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Korea: Population ages 65-69, female, per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.0234 units per person
in 2025
Korea
0.0368 units per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
13th
Korea rank
15th

Population ages 65-69, female, per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Korea
0.010.020.030.04196019922025

How they compare

Korea currently reports 0.0368 units per person against 0.0234 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0134 units per person.

That makes Korea's figure about 1.6 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 13th and Korea ranks 15th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 3 and Korea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0092 units per person 0.0086 units per person 0.0006 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1970s 0.0096 units per person 0.0086 units per person 0.0009 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1980s 0.0102 units per person 0.0102 units per person 0.0001 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s 0.0116 units per person 0.0134 units per person 0.0018 units per person Korea
2000s 0.0134 units per person 0.0184 units per person 0.0051 units per person Korea
2010s 0.0171 units per person 0.0216 units per person 0.0044 units per person Korea
2020s 0.0237 units per person 0.0318 units per person 0.0081 units per person Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65-69, female, per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Korea?
Korea, at 0.0368 units per person against 0.0234 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 65-69, female, per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Korea?
0.0134 units per person, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Korea?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Korea rank globally for population ages 65-69, female, per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 13th and Korea ranks 15th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Korea: Population ages 65-69, female, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/korea-rep/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Korea: Population ages 65-69, female, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65-69, female, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 65-69, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.