Curaçao vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Population ages 65-69, female, per capita

Curaçao
0.0356 units per person
in 2025
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
0.0191 units per person
in 2025
Curaçao rank
19th
Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank
19th

Population ages 65-69, female, per capita over time

  • Curaçao
  • Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
0.010.020.030.04196019922025

How they compare

Curaçao currently reports 0.0356 units per person against 0.0191 units per person in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0165 units per person.

That makes Curaçao's figure about 1.9 times Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Curaçao has been ahead every year.

Curaçao ranks 19th and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 19th of 218 countries.

Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curaçao Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0108 units per person 0.0074 units per person 0.0034 units per person Curaçao
1970s 0.0117 units per person 0.0081 units per person 0.0036 units per person Curaçao
1980s 0.0123 units per person 0.0087 units per person 0.0036 units per person Curaçao
1990s 0.0156 units per person 0.0101 units per person 0.0055 units per person Curaçao
2000s 0.0213 units per person 0.0112 units per person 0.0101 units per person Curaçao
2010s 0.0289 units per person 0.0142 units per person 0.0147 units per person Curaçao
2020s 0.0333 units per person 0.0179 units per person 0.0154 units per person Curaçao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65-69, female, per capita, Curaçao or Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
Curaçao, at 0.0356 units per person against 0.0191 units per person in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 65-69, female, per capita between Curaçao and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
0.0165 units per person, with Curaçao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Curaçao and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank globally for population ages 65-69, female, per capita?
Curaçao ranks 19th and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curaçao vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Population ages 65-69, female, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-capita/curacao/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-per-capita/curacao/latin-america-and-caribbean-excluding-high-income/">Curaçao vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): Population ages 65-69, female, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65-69, female, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 65-69, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.