Sri Lanka vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate

Sri Lanka
1.03 % change on previous year
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
1.1 % change on previous year
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
191st
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
189th

Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0246196119932025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 1.1 % change on previous year against 1.03 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.07 % change on previous year.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 191st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 189th of 218 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 3.2 % change on previous year 3.36 % change on previous year 0.1593 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 3.8 % change on previous year 4.76 % change on previous year 0.9611 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 3.92 % change on previous year 2.21 % change on previous year 1.71 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
1990s 2.83 % change on previous year 1.8 % change on previous year 1.03 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
2000s 2.59 % change on previous year 2.61 % change on previous year 0.0211 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 4.78 % change on previous year 4.98 % change on previous year 0.196 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 1.52 % change on previous year 2.71 % change on previous year 1.18 % change on previous year Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate, Sri Lanka or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 1.1 % change on previous year against 1.03 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate between Sri Lanka and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.07 % change on previous year, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tanzania, United Republic of?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Sri Lanka and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate?
Sri Lanka ranks 191st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 189th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-annual-growth-rate/sri-lanka/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-annual-growth-rate/sri-lanka/tanzania/">Sri Lanka vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,000 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Population ages 65-69, female. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.