Late-demographic dividend vs Liechtenstein: Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate

Late-demographic dividend
-2.42 % change on previous year
in 2025
Liechtenstein
5.37 % change on previous year
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend rank
40th
Liechtenstein rank
37th

Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Liechtenstein
-5051015196119932025

How they compare

Liechtenstein currently reports 5.37 % change on previous year against -2.42 % change on previous year in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 7.79 % change on previous year.

That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 2.2 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liechtenstein ahead.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 40th and Liechtenstein ranks 37th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Late-demographic dividend averaged higher in 2 and Liechtenstein in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
1960s 2.8 % change on previous year 3.87 % change on previous year 1.07 % change on previous year Liechtenstein
1970s 2.45 % change on previous year 2.66 % change on previous year 0.2105 % change on previous year Liechtenstein
1980s 1.77 % change on previous year 1.85 % change on previous year 0.0843 % change on previous year Liechtenstein
1990s 2.69 % change on previous year -0.5006 % change on previous year 3.19 % change on previous year Late-demographic dividend
2000s 0.909 % change on previous year 4.89 % change on previous year 3.98 % change on previous year Liechtenstein
2010s 5.71 % change on previous year 2.48 % change on previous year 3.23 % change on previous year Late-demographic dividend
2020s 1.29 % change on previous year 3.97 % change on previous year 2.68 % change on previous year Liechtenstein

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate, Late-demographic dividend or Liechtenstein?
Liechtenstein, at 5.37 % change on previous year against -2.42 % change on previous year in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate between Late-demographic dividend and Liechtenstein?
7.79 % change on previous year, with Liechtenstein ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Liechtenstein?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Liechtenstein rank globally for population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 40th and Liechtenstein ranks 37th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Liechtenstein: Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-annual-growth-rate/late-demographic-dividend/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-65-69-female-annual-growth-rate/late-demographic-dividend/liechtenstein/">Late-demographic dividend vs Liechtenstein: Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 65-69, female, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,000 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Population ages 65-69, female. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.