Norway vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre

Norway
0.4424 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.4694 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
173rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
171st

Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.4694 units per square kilometre against 0.4424 units per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.027 units per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 173rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 171st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2493 units per square kilometre 0.1004 units per square kilometre 0.149 units per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.2833 units per square kilometre 0.1563 units per square kilometre 0.127 units per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.294 units per square kilometre 0.2038 units per square kilometre 0.0902 units per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.2439 units per square kilometre 0.2543 units per square kilometre 0.0104 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0.3161 units per square kilometre 0.3486 units per square kilometre 0.0325 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.4038 units per square kilometre 0.418 units per square kilometre 0.0142 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.4341 units per square kilometre 0.4518 units per square kilometre 0.0178 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre, Norway or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.4694 units per square kilometre against 0.4424 units per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre between Norway and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.027 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Norway and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 173rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 171st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-male-per-square-kilometre/norway/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-male-per-square-kilometre/norway/tanzania/">Norway vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 60-64, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.