Guinea-Bissau vs New Zealand: Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
0.5431 units per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0.5751 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
164th
New Zealand rank
163rd

Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • New Zealand
0.20.30.40.50.6196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.5751 units per square kilometre against 0.5431 units per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.032 units per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 164th and New Zealand ranks 163rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 5 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2357 units per square kilometre 0.1822 units per square kilometre 0.0535 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1970s 0.3157 units per square kilometre 0.22 units per square kilometre 0.0958 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.3227 units per square kilometre 0.2461 units per square kilometre 0.0766 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 0.3454 units per square kilometre 0.2681 units per square kilometre 0.0773 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.3478 units per square kilometre 0.3427 units per square kilometre 0.0051 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.445 units per square kilometre 0.4661 units per square kilometre 0.0211 units per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.5216 units per square kilometre 0.552 units per square kilometre 0.0304 units per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.5751 units per square kilometre against 0.5431 units per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and New Zealand?
0.032 units per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and New Zealand rank globally for population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 164th and New Zealand ranks 163rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs New Zealand: Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-male-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-male-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/new-zealand/">Guinea-Bissau vs New Zealand: Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 60-64, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.