Ecuador vs United States of America: Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre

Ecuador
1.24 units per square kilometre
in 2023
United States of America
1.15 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
129th
United States of America rank
132nd

Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • United States of America
0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 1.24 units per square kilometre against 1.15 units per square kilometre in United States of America, a difference of 0.09 units per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times United States of America's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States of America ahead.

Ecuador ranks 129th and United States of America ranks 132nd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and United States of America in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1892 units per square kilometre 0.4009 units per square kilometre 0.2117 units per square kilometre United States of America
1970s 0.2364 units per square kilometre 0.4679 units per square kilometre 0.2315 units per square kilometre United States of America
1980s 0.2982 units per square kilometre 0.5368 units per square kilometre 0.2386 units per square kilometre United States of America
1990s 0.4248 units per square kilometre 0.5357 units per square kilometre 0.1109 units per square kilometre United States of America
2000s 0.6543 units per square kilometre 0.689 units per square kilometre 0.0347 units per square kilometre United States of America
2010s 0.9737 units per square kilometre 0.9932 units per square kilometre 0.0195 units per square kilometre United States of America
2020s 1.19 units per square kilometre 1.14 units per square kilometre 0.0487 units per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre, Ecuador or United States of America?
Ecuador, at 1.24 units per square kilometre against 1.15 units per square kilometre in United States of America as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre between Ecuador and United States of America?
0.09 units per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and United States of America?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and United States of America rank globally for population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 129th and United States of America ranks 132nd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs United States of America: Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-male-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-male-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/united-states/">Ecuador vs United States of America: Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 60-64, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.