Late-demographic dividend vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Population ages 60-64, male, per capita

Late-demographic dividend
0.0295 units per person
in 2025
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
0.0381 units per person
in 2025
Late-demographic dividend rank
8th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
9th

Population ages 60-64, male, per capita over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
0.010.020.030.04196019922025

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 0.0381 units per person against 0.0295 units per person in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0086 units per person.

That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 1.3 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 8th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 9th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Late-demographic dividend averaged higher in 3 and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0117 units per person 0.012 units per person 0.0003 units per person Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
1970s 0.0118 units per person 0.0119 units per person 0.0001 units per person Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
1980s 0.0128 units per person 0.0073 units per person 0.0055 units per person Late-demographic dividend
1990s 0.0153 units per person 0.0067 units per person 0.0087 units per person Late-demographic dividend
2000s 0.0162 units per person 0.0136 units per person 0.0026 units per person Late-demographic dividend
2010s 0.0236 units per person 0.0267 units per person 0.0031 units per person Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2020s 0.0259 units per person 0.0351 units per person 0.0093 units per person Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, male, per capita, Late-demographic dividend or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 0.0381 units per person against 0.0295 units per person in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, male, per capita between Late-demographic dividend and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
0.0086 units per person, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for population ages 60-64, male, per capita?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 8th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 9th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, male, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Population ages 60-64, male, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-male-per-capita/late-demographic-dividend/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-male-per-capita/late-demographic-dividend/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Late-demographic dividend vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Population ages 60-64, male, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, male, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 60-64, male divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.