East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Hong Kong: Population ages 60-64, male, per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.0286 units per person
in 2025
Hong Kong
0.0383 units per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
10th
Hong Kong rank
7th

Population ages 60-64, male, per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Hong Kong
0.010.020.030.04196019922025

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0.0383 units per person against 0.0286 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0097 units per person.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.3 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 10th and Hong Kong ranks 7th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0112 units per person 0.0076 units per person 0.0036 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1970s 0.0111 units per person 0.0149 units per person 0.0038 units per person Hong Kong
1980s 0.0122 units per person 0.0187 units per person 0.0065 units per person Hong Kong
1990s 0.0141 units per person 0.0212 units per person 0.0071 units per person Hong Kong
2000s 0.0154 units per person 0.0197 units per person 0.0043 units per person Hong Kong
2010s 0.0221 units per person 0.0315 units per person 0.0094 units per person Hong Kong
2020s 0.0244 units per person 0.039 units per person 0.0145 units per person Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, male, per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 0.0383 units per person against 0.0286 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, male, per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Hong Kong?
0.0097 units per person, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Hong Kong?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Hong Kong rank globally for population ages 60-64, male, per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 10th and Hong Kong ranks 7th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, male, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Hong Kong: Population ages 60-64, male, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-male-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-male-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/hong-kong-sar-china/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Hong Kong: Population ages 60-64, male, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, male, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 60-64, male divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.