IBRD only vs Lithuania: Population ages 60-64, female
IBRD only
5.1%
in 2025
Lithuania
7.5%
in 2025
IBRD only rank
17th
Lithuania rank
18th
Population ages 60-64, female over time
- IBRD only
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 7.5% against 5.1% in IBRD only, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.5 times IBRD only's.
Across all 66 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 17th and Lithuania ranks 18th of 47 groups.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.7% | 4.8% | 2.1% | Lithuania |
| 1970s | 2.7% | 4.4% | 1.7% | Lithuania |
| 1980s | 2.7% | 4.9% | 2.2% | Lithuania |
| 1990s | 3.0% | 5.8% | 2.8% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 3.0% | 5.6% | 2.5% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 4.2% | 6.3% | 2.2% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 4.7% | 7.7% | 3.1% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 60-64, female, IBRD only or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 7.5% against 5.1% in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in population ages 60-64, female between IBRD only and Lithuania?
- 2.4%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Lithuania?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
- How do IBRD only and Lithuania rank globally for population ages 60-64, female?
- IBRD only ranks 17th and Lithuania ranks 18th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN), publisher: UN Population Division, published as Population ages 60-64, female (% of female population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Female population between the ages 60 to 64 as a percentage of the total female population.