Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre

Samoa
1.27 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.33 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa rank
127th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
126th

Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Samoa
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 1.33 units per square kilometre against 1.27 units per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 0.06 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Samoa ahead.

Samoa ranks 127th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 126th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3325 units per square kilometre 0.1044 units per square kilometre 0.2281 units per square kilometre Samoa
1970s 0.3954 units per square kilometre 0.0945 units per square kilometre 0.3008 units per square kilometre Samoa
1980s 0.5555 units per square kilometre 0.1211 units per square kilometre 0.4344 units per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 0.6424 units per square kilometre 0.1271 units per square kilometre 0.5154 units per square kilometre Samoa
2000s 0.6968 units per square kilometre 0.2538 units per square kilometre 0.443 units per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 0.8716 units per square kilometre 0.7939 units per square kilometre 0.0777 units per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 1.2 units per square kilometre 1.24 units per square kilometre 0.0446 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre, Samoa or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 1.33 units per square kilometre against 1.27 units per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre between Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.06 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre?
Samoa ranks 127th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 126th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/samoa/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/samoa/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 60-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.