New Zealand vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre

New Zealand
0.616 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.629 units per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
164th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
163rd

Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • New Zealand
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.629 units per square kilometre against 0.616 units per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.013 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 164th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1887 units per square kilometre 0.1152 units per square kilometre 0.0735 units per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.2359 units per square kilometre 0.1669 units per square kilometre 0.069 units per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.2608 units per square kilometre 0.2212 units per square kilometre 0.0396 units per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.2707 units per square kilometre 0.2694 units per square kilometre 0.0014 units per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.3534 units per square kilometre 0.3593 units per square kilometre 0.0059 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.4888 units per square kilometre 0.5418 units per square kilometre 0.053 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.5893 units per square kilometre 0.6245 units per square kilometre 0.0352 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre, New Zealand or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.629 units per square kilometre against 0.616 units per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre between New Zealand and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.013 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre?
New Zealand ranks 164th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/tanzania/">New Zealand vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 60-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.