Naoero vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre
Naoero
7.65 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.5135 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero rank
40th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
37th
Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre over time
- Naoero
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 7.65 units per square kilometre against 0.5135 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 7.14 units per square kilometre.
That makes Naoero's figure about 14.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.
Naoero ranks 40th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 216 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.28 units per square kilometre | 0.1299 units per square kilometre | 1.15 units per square kilometre | Naoero |
| 1970s | 0.885 units per square kilometre | 0.1642 units per square kilometre | 0.7208 units per square kilometre | Naoero |
| 1980s | 4.6 units per square kilometre | 0.2127 units per square kilometre | 4.39 units per square kilometre | Naoero |
| 1990s | 2.56 units per square kilometre | 0.2605 units per square kilometre | 2.3 units per square kilometre | Naoero |
| 2000s | 2.26 units per square kilometre | 0.3176 units per square kilometre | 1.95 units per square kilometre | Naoero |
| 2010s | 5.98 units per square kilometre | 0.3889 units per square kilometre | 5.59 units per square kilometre | Naoero |
| 2020s | 7.78 units per square kilometre | 0.4892 units per square kilometre | 7.29 units per square kilometre | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre, Naoero or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Naoero, at 7.65 units per square kilometre against 0.5135 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre between Naoero and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 7.14 units per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Naoero and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre?
- Naoero ranks 40th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population ages 60-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.