Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre

Guinea
0.6023 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.629 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea rank
165th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
163rd

Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.629 units per square kilometre against 0.6023 units per square kilometre in Guinea, a difference of 0.0267 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea ahead.

Guinea ranks 165th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1891 units per square kilometre 0.1152 units per square kilometre 0.0739 units per square kilometre Guinea
1970s 0.236 units per square kilometre 0.1669 units per square kilometre 0.0691 units per square kilometre Guinea
1980s 0.2889 units per square kilometre 0.2212 units per square kilometre 0.0677 units per square kilometre Guinea
1990s 0.3498 units per square kilometre 0.2694 units per square kilometre 0.0804 units per square kilometre Guinea
2000s 0.3967 units per square kilometre 0.3593 units per square kilometre 0.0374 units per square kilometre Guinea
2010s 0.4823 units per square kilometre 0.5418 units per square kilometre 0.0595 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.5772 units per square kilometre 0.6245 units per square kilometre 0.0473 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre, Guinea or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.629 units per square kilometre against 0.6023 units per square kilometre in Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre between Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0267 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre?
Guinea ranks 165th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/guinea/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/guinea/tanzania/">Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 60-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.